For how many centimes hocatec or percent rise in electricity prices after the addition of RES energ

Thursday, February 9, evening program "Europe - Myths and Reality" was advertised a lot of so-called hocatec "green energy", but unfortunately the game took place in goal, because there were only invited to discuss this energy vendors, but the program manager, came to the problem of inadequate, very weak the ability to argue that pressure. Consequently, only heard myths, but the cost of reality was quickly suppressed and circumvented.
First of all, why do we need so much, and at all costs necessary to expand the use of renewable energy sources, if after "Latvenergo" the data we already have electricity generation in the second greenest country in the EU?
This same "Latvenergo" the blog reads: "The European Union declared the electricity sector by 2050 to achieve the goal of emissions - 100 g / kWh CO2 specific emissions hocatec per unit of electricity generated. Latvia this goal with 104 g / kWh in fact has already been reached, in this area almost repeatedly outpacing Estonia, the specific emissions per produced unit of electricity is almost ten times higher - 1,100 g / kWh (source - "Eesti hocatec Energia" Annual report 2008/2009). On average, in Europe the figure is 390 g / kWh - almost hocatec four times higher than Latvian. hocatec "
But for some reason we want at any price to be "holier hocatec than the Pope." Here's hocatec what the article Maris Balodis, a / s "Latvenergo" hocatec research and development director: ".... Latvian currently running a little over 200 with renewable energy (RES) powered stations with a total power generation in the first nine months has been about 0.164 TWh. grouped by type, in 2011, worked for 19 wind plants (capacity above 0.25 MW), 18 wind plants (capacity below 0.25 MW), biomass stations 7, 23 biogas plants and 140 small hydro power plants. In turn, the 2012th In operation could start another 9 projects. In recent years, most have developed a biogas station projects. If the total Latvian hocatec elektropatēriņš year is about 7 TWh, with the AER-powered stations (without the Daugava HPP) in 2011 will be produced by a little less than 3% of the total electricity consumption in the country. hocatec This electricity is paid 2.7 times more than the market price of electricity. "
This dear AER Energy, mixed with relatively cheap "Latvenergo" electricity, the price increases for the so-called mandatory procurement components (oik). The more energy is produced and purchased the mandatory purchase of RES energy in a growing part of this oik ".... the new tariff structure (from 01/04/2011) new oik value compared to 2008 and will have doubled 0,0117Ls / kWh or 1.17 sant. / kWh. "
Based on the "Latvenergo" "Information on electricity prices" and assuming that the other parameters remain the same, tried to simulate the appearance of the final consumer "Start" and "basic" rates with and without the mandatory renewable energy procurement. The results are summarized in Table 1 and graphically in Figure 3.
We can see that without the mandatory renewable energy procurement we pay startup Tariff 6,82 snt / kWh, but the basic tariff 9,31 snt / kWh, while the addition hocatec of oik, startup rate increases by 21% (1.43 snt = x oik VAT) up to 8,25 snt / kWh, but the basic tariff increase by slightly more than 15% (including 1.43 snt), reaching 10.74 snt / kWh.
Everyone can look at their electricity bills and then look how he paid too much marginal 3% "in addition to the greenery 'behalf. I am afraid that some good after such parēķināšanas can also become green, but with anger. hocatec In addition, somehow badly turns out that those who are already gently used electricity and fits into the starting tariff, ie the annual consumption of less than 1200 kWh, forced to donate a relatively larger share (21%) of its own costs on the "altar of greenery" than those who consume recklessly ("only" 15%).
Prudent doing outermost RES development plans analyzed here. Even for VES (wind power) rapid expansion, "..Vēja power plants with a capacity exceeding 0.25 MW this year's (2011) nine months have produced approximately 46 GWh of electricity and the installed capacity of 32 MW. In past three years (2008 . - 2010) it has not been a significant development. Disposal in the future are being prepared and reviewed wind farm projects with a total capacity of 2,800 MW, but it can be expected that the exercise hocatec could be only a fraction of them. Around 800 MW (which is no mean feat - it is about the Latvian average electric load) the total amount of power projects have received both the license and issued Technical Rules of the transmission system operator. Of these quotas have only received a few projects to the total power generation of about 230 GWh per year. "
For how many centimes hocatec or percent rise in electricity prices after the addition of RES energy hocatec suppliers' entry into the ranks? " How far this will go in addition to renewable energy quota allocation? And finally - what it profitable? But it is not "Latvenergo", nor with